01 TOUCHSTONE
Chaotic In-Person Mentorship
Connection is crucial for us to feel support from each other, especially in mentoring scenarios such as workshops, design springs, boot camps, as well as hackathons. However, in lots of cases, the mentoring process encounters challenges due to the large amount of attendees, complex event structures, and multi-channel communication. These difficulties might cause inefficiency in mentoring because extra cognitive/workload is required for mentors in sourcing and digesting the information and navigating to the teams location and their problems. This slower reviewing and mentoring process finally results in fewer mentorship opportunities and capability for teams who need help forming and building innovative ideas and solutions.
Ideal Mentorship Workflow
After interviewing two mentors at Reality Hack, I identified an ideal workflow: teams submit mentorship requests to the system, where all mentors can view them. Mentors then review the request details and decide whether to offer assistance, and the system holds the request once a mentor accepts it.
Throughout this process, the team identification, request status, and issue description are considered the most crucial pieces of information. Therefore, the key to enhancing productivity lies in designing a tool for mentors that help them seamlessly identify teams and make informed decisions about offering assistance.